The Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (12-13, 6-8 ACC) are favored (by 3.5 points) to continue a three-game home winning streak when they host the California Golden Bears (12-13, 5-9 ACC) on Saturday, February 15, 2025 at 4:00 PM ET. The over/under is 143.5 for the matchup.
Check out all the Latest NCAA Basketball Betting Previews!
Spread
Bet $20, Payout $37.86
Georgia Tech Cover -3.5 vs Cal -112
Georgia Tech vs. Cal betting lines
- Georgia Tech moneyline odds to win: -180
- Cal moneyline odds to win: +150
- Spread: Georgia Tech (-3.5)
- Total: 143.5
Georgia Tech statistics, trends and more
As the home team
- When playing at home, Georgia Tech sports a better record against the spread (8-8-0) compared to its ATS record in road games (3-5-0).
- At home, the Yellow Jackets go over the over/under 37.5% of the time (six of 16 games). They hit the over more consistently in away games, going over the total in 50% of games (four of eight).
Recent trends
- The Yellow Jackets’ offense has been less productive over their last 10 games, racking up 68.9 points a contest compared to the 74 they’ve averaged this year.
- Georgia Tech’s points-allowed average over its past 10 games (73.4) is 0.5 more points per game than the team is allowing over the entire season (72.9).
- The Yellow Jackets are trending down from beyond the arc during their last 10 outings, making 6.8 threes per game and shooting 32.2% from long range in comparison to their season-long averages of 7.4 makes and 33.8% from distance in the 2024-25 season.
Georgia Tech betting records this season
- ATS Record: 11-14-0 (Home: 8-8-0; Away: 3-5-0)
- ATS Record When Favored by 3.5+: 5-4-0 (As Favorite: 7-4-0; As Underdog: 4-10-0)
- O-U-P: 10-15-0 (Home: 6-10-0; Away: 4-4-0)
- Record When Moneyline Favorite: 10-1 (Home: 10-1; Away: 0-0)
- Record When Moneyline Underdog: 2-12 (Home: 1-4; Away: 1-7)
| Field Goal % | Opp. Field Goal % | Rebounds | Opp. Rebounds | Assists | Turnovers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.2 (217th in nation) | 42 (88th) | 33.6 (98th) | 33.1 (296th) | 14.7 (110th) | 11.3 (182nd) |
Need to know more about sports betting before you put down a wager on Georgia Tech vs. Cal? Here’s everything you need to know about how to bet.
Cal statistics, trends and more
As the away team
- Cal has performed better against the spread on the road (7-2-0) than at home (7-8-0) this season.
- Golden Bears games have gone above the over/under 60% of the time at home (nine of 15), and 22.2% of the time on the road (two of nine).
- In 2024-25 when moneyline underdogs, the Golden Bears have a better winning percentage at home (.500, 1-1 record) than on the road (.222, 2-7).
Recent trends
- The Golden Bears have fared worse offensively over their previous 10 games, compiling 68.9 points per contest, 5.2 fewer points their than season average of 74.1.
- Cal is ceding 74.1 points per contest in its last 10 games, which is one fewer point than it is allowing for the season (75.1).
- The Golden Bears are making 6.6 threes per contest over their last 10 games, which is 0.6 fewer three-pointers than their average for the season (7.2). In addition, they have a lower three-point percentage over their previous 10 contests (26.3%) compared to their season average from downtown (31.6%).
Cal betting records this season
- ATS Record: 14-11-0 (Home: 7-8-0; Away: 7-2-0)
- ATS Record When Underdog by 3.5+: 7-3-0 (As Favorite: 6-7-0; As Underdog: 8-4-0)
- O-U-P: 11-13-1 (Home: 9-5-1; Away: 2-7-0)
- Record When Moneyline Favorite: 9-4 (Home: 9-4; Away: 0-0)
- Record When Moneyline Underdog: 3-9 (Home: 1-1; Away: 2-7)
| Field Goal % | Opp. Field Goal % | Rebounds | Opp. Rebounds | Assists | Turnovers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41.9 (325th in nation) | 46.5 (321st) | 32.8 (138th) | 31.2 (182nd) | 10.4 (357th) | 10.8 (130th) |
Author Profile
BetDecider Team
The BetDecider team brings you the most current sports betting content, with expert insights and tips. Our aim is that you can make an informed betting decision, including best odds and exclusive sportsbook offers, to maximize your betting experience.
